[PAA-Discuss] Fwd: A campaign that challenges corporate "personhood"
Randy Scott
rscott77070 at yahoo.com
Mon Jun 12 14:12:50 EDT 2006
Doesn't Texas already HAVE a law against corporate campaign contributions? Isn't that one of the
laws that DeLay is charged with flouting?
And we don't have "Initiative & Referendum" either do we?
Randy
--- ChasMauch at aol.com wrote:
> This email from David Cobb, formerly of Houston and Green Party presidential
> candidate in 2004, tells about a very interesting movement to overcome one
> of the worst problems of democracy - the theory of corporate "personhood".
> Charlie M
> ______________
> > To: chasmauch at aol.com
> From: David Cobb <cobbweb at greens.org>
> Subject: A campaign that challenges corporate "personhood"
> Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 00:50:38 -0700
>
> Hello folks,
>
> I am sending this out to folks who I work with or who I know to be
> actively engaged in the movement to challenge the legal doctrines that
> enshrine and protect corporate rule, and who are dedicated to building
> a real democracy movement in this country.
>
> I am writing because there is an exciting political development
> underway in Humboldt County California with truly national
> significance. The election is this June 6, and I am hoping you will
> consider commenting/reporting/blogging on this story within your own
> networks. Please forward it as you see fit.
>
> Local citizens have used the initiative process to launch a ballot
> initiative that will prohibit large out-of-county corporations from
> making political contributions in local elections. Not only does this
> effort address a real and concrete problem, but the initiative includes
> a direct challenge to the legal doctrine that a corporation must be
> treated as a "person" with vested constitutional rights! A political
> reporter from the LA Times is here to cover the election because, in
> his words, "this is the most exciting local initiative on the ballot in
> the entire state."
>
> John Bonifaz, the founder of After Downing Street as well as the
> National Voting Rights Institute, agrees. He has called this
> initiative "one of the most important local democracy efforts happening
> anywhere in the United States. If this passes, it will have profound
> ramifications for campaign finance reform efforts across the country."
>
> And to make it even sweeter, the core campaign team is being lead by
> young women! The two campaign managers, the media spokesperson and the
> treasurer are all woman in their twenties. I am the token middle-aged
> white male lawyer in the crew....<grin>
>
> Below is the story that will appear in the next issue of The
> Progressive Populist.
>
> Please feel free to contact me directly or the campaign itself at
> 707-444-0407. The campaign website is at www.votelocalcontrol.org
>
> In solidarity,
> David Cobb
> Fellow, Liberty Tree Foundation for the Democratic Revolution
> (www.libertytreefdr.org)
> Collective Member, Democracy Unlimited of Humboldt County (www.duhc.org)
> 707-476-8502 (home/office)
>
>
> The Progressive Populist
> June 1, 2006
> www.populist.com/06.10.cobb.html
>
> A New Populist Uprising
>
>
> Something profoundly important is happening in the shadows of the
> redwoods of Northern California. On June 6, voters in Humboldt County
> will have the opportunity to vote on an historic initiative -- the
> Ordinance to Protect Our Right to Fair Elections and Local Democracy.
>
> If passed, this ordinance (known locally as Measure T) will prohibit
> non-local corporations from making political contributions in Humboldt
> County elections. This alone would make the ordinance worthy of support
> amongst progressives. But this ordinance goes so much deeper.
>
> The official ballot language includes a direct challenge to the
> ridiculous notion that a corporation is a "person" with vested
> constitutional rights. Specifically, the ordinance provides that "only
> natural human persons possess civil and political rights, and
> corporations are creations of state law and possess no legitimate civil
> or political rights."
>
> There is the additional assertion that "courts have illegitimately
> defined corporations as 'persons' and this doctrine illegitimately
> denies the people of Humboldt County the ability to exercise our
> fundamental political rights." And to add teeth, the initiative
> provides that "no corporation shall be entitled to claim corporate
> constitutional rights or protections in an effort to overturn this
> law."
>
> Talk about a community standing up for itself!
>
> Just how did such a direct and unambiguous challenge to the wealthy
> elite and their control of elections ever make it to the ballot box? By
> use of one of the great success stories of the first populist uprising
> -- the citizen's initiative process.
>
> Proponents of the effort contend that large corporations are exerting
> undue influence on their local political campaigns. Like virtually
> every community in the United States, they have solid evidence for
> their claim. In 1999, the Wal-Mart Corporation paid for a ballot
> initiative to overturn portions of the area's zoning laws and then
> spent $250,000 on the campaign. In 2003, Maxxam Corporation invested
> $300,000 to fund a campaign to recall newly-elected District Attorney
> Paul Gallegos after he filed fraud charges against the company. It is
> worth noting that these two examples of corporate election bullying
> used paid petitioners to try to hijack the citizen's initiative
> process.
>
> In stark contrast, the Measure T effort has been an all-volunteer
> effort of ordinary people who are coming together to address a very
> real problem (outside corporate money trying to buy elections), while
> simultaneously building a citizen's movement to challenge the ability
> of corporations to claim constitutional rights.
>
> Another exciting aspect of the campaign is just how broad and diverse
> it is. The local Democratic Party and the local Green Party have both
> formally endorsed the effort, and leaders of both parties are working
> arm-in-arm during the campaign. Every major organized labor union in
> the county has joined with the Sierra Club, the Women's International
> League for Peace & Freedom and others in supporting the campaign.
>
> Stated simply, the entire spectrum of the peace, social justice,
> environmental movements are working together in Humboldt County. They
> are modeling the kind of respectful unity that progressives so often
> talk about, but so rarely manage to accomplish. And they are engaged in
> a concrete campaign that is strategically designed to change the rules
> of the game so that future progressive victories will be easier.
>
> It is important to understand that this proactive effort did not
> spring up out of thin air. It is a direct result of years of
> old-fashioned community organizing and educating by Democracy Unlimited
> of Humboldt County (DUHC). DUHC educates citizens regarding the role
> that corporations have played in an illegitimate seizure of our
> authority to govern ourselves, and they design and implement grassroots
> strategies that exercise democratic power over corporations and
> governments. They are seeking to create a truly democratic society by
> provoking a non-violent popular uprising against corporate rule in
> Humboldt County that can serve as a model for other communities across
> the United States.
>
> Just like the populists of the agrarian movement of the late 19th
> century, these folks understand that genuine mass movements cannot be
> top-down driven. The formation of a mass movement that can achieve
> political viability must proceed from the ground up. And the battles
> must be waged in our local communities.
>
> If you want to learn more about the effort, or want some help in
> replicating this in your area, give them a call at 707-444-0407 or
> check out online at www.votelocalcontrol.org.
>
>
>
> > ---------------
> Progressive Action Alliance http://progressiveactionalliance.org/
> Discuss mailing list Discuss at paa-tx.org
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, access the archives, or change your options on this list, go to:
> http://paa-tx.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_paa-tx.org
>
> To reply only to the person posting this note, use "Reply".
> To reply so that everyone on this list receives your note, use "Reply All".
> Check the "To:" field in your message, before sending, to ensure it goes to the correct address.
>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list