[PAA-Discuss] Americans have lost their country

Ron and Kris Graham graham2639 at mindspring.com
Sat Mar 3 11:45:55 EST 2007


rense.com

Americans Have
Lost Their Country
By Paul Craig Roberts
3-1-7


The Bush-Cheney regime is America's first neoconservative regime. In a few
short years, the regime has destroyed the Bill of Rights, the separation of
powers, the Geneva Conventions, and the remains of America's moral
reputation along with the infrastructures of two Muslim countries and
countless thousands of Islamic civilians. Plans have been prepared, and
forces moved into place, for an attack on a third Islamic country, Iran, and
perhaps Syria and Hezbollah in Lebanon as well. 

  

This extraordinary aggressiveness toward the US Constitution, international
law, and the Islamic world is the work, not of a vast movement, but of a
handful of ideologues - principally Vice President Dick Cheney, Donald
Rumsfeld, Lewis Libby, Douglas Feith, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Elliott
Abrams, Zalmay Khalilzad, John Bolton, Philip Zelikow, and Attorney General
Gonzales. These are the main operatives who have controlled policy. They
have been supported by their media shills at the Weekly Standard, National
Review, Fox News, New York Times, CNN, and the Wall Street Journal editorial
page and by "scholars" in assorted think tanks such as the American
Enterprise Institute. 

  

The entirety of their success in miring the United States in what could
become permanent conflict in the Middle East is based on the power of
propaganda and the big lie. 

  

Initially, the 9/11 attack was blamed on Osama bin Laden, but after an
American puppet was installed in Afghanistan, the blame for 9/11 was shifted
to Iraq's Saddam Hussein, who was said to have weapons of mass destruction
that would be used against America. The regime sent Secretary of State Colin
Powell to tell the lie to the UN that the Bush-Cheney regime had conclusive
proof of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. 

  

Having conned the UN, Congress, and the American people, the regime invaded
Iraq under totally false pretenses and with totally false expectations. The
regime's occupation of Iraq has failed in a military sense, but the
neoconservatives are turning their failure into a strategic advantage. At
the beginning of this year President Bush began blaming Iran for America's
embarrassing defeat by a few thousand lightly armed insurgents in Iraq. 

  

Bush accuses Iran of arming the Iraqi insurgents, a charge that experts
regard as improbable. The Iraqi insurgents are Sunni. They inflict
casualties on our troops, but spend most of their energy killing Iraqi
Shi'ites, who are closely allied with Iran, which is Shi'ite. Bush's
accusation requires us to believe that Iran is arming the enemies of its
allies. 

  

On the basis of this absurd accusation - a pure invention - Bush has ordered
a heavy concentration of aircraft carrier attack forces off Iran's coast,
and he has moved US attack planes to Turkish bases and other US bases in
countries contingent to Iran. In testimony before Congress on February 1 of
this year, former National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski said that he
expected the regime to orchestrate a "head-on conflict with Iran and with
much of the world of Islam at large." He said a plausible scenario was "a
terrorist act blamed on Iran, culminating in a 'defensive' US military
action against Iran." He said that the neoconservative propaganda machine
was already articulating a "mythical historical narrative" for widening
their war against Islam. 

  

Why is the US spending one trillion dollars on wars, the reasons for which
are patently false? What is going on? 

  

There are several parts to the answer. Like their forebears among the
Jacobins of the French Revolution, the Bolsheviks of the communist
revolution, and the National Socialists of Hitler's revolution,
neoconservatives believe that they have a monopoly on virtue and the right
to impose hegemony on the rest of the world. Neoconservative conquests began
in the Middle East because oil and Israel, with which neocons are closely
allied, are both in the Middle East. The American oil giant, UNOCAL, had
plans for an oil and gas pipeline through Afghanistan, but the Taliban were
not sufficiently cooperative. The US invasion of Afghanistan was used to
install Hamid Karzai, who had been on UNOCAL's payroll, as puppet prime
minister. US neoconservative Zalmay Khalilzad, who also had been on UNOCAL's
payroll, was installed as US ambassador to Afghanistan. 

  

Two years later Khalilzad was appointed US ambassador to Iraq. American oil
companies have been given control over the exploitation of Iraq's oil
resources. 

  

The Israeli relationship is perhaps even more important. In 1996 Richard
Perle and the usual collection of neocons proposed that all of Israel's
enemies in the Middle East be overthrown. "Israel's enemies" consist of the
Muslim countries not in the hands of US puppets or allies. For decades
Israel has been stealing Palestine from the Palestinians such that today
there is not enough of Palestine left to comprise an independent country.
The US and Israeli governments blame Iran, Iraq, and Syria for aiding and
abetting Palestinian resistance to Israel's theft of Palestine. 

  

The Bush-Cheney regime came to power with the plans drawn to attack the
remaining independent countries in the Middle East and with neoconservatives
in office to implement the plans. However, an excuse was required.
Neoconservatives had called for "a new Pearl Harbor," and 9/11 provided the
propaganda event needed in order to stampede the public and Congress into
war. Neoconservative Philip Zelikow was put in charge of the 9/11 Commission
Report to make certain no uncomfortable facts emerged. 

  

The neoconservatives have had enormous help from the corporate media, from
Christian evangelicals, particularly from the "Rapture Evangelicals," from
flag-waving superpatriots, and from the military- industrial complex whose
profits have prospered. But the fact remains that the dozen men named in the
second paragraph above were able to overthrow the US Constitution and launch
military aggression under the guise of a preventive/preemptive "war against
terrorism." 

  

When the American people caught on that the "war on terror" was a cloak for
wars of aggression, they put Democrats in control of Congress in order to
apply a brake to the regime's warmongering. However, the Democrats have
proven to be impotent to stop the neoconservative drive to wider war and,
perhaps, world conflagration. We are witnessing the triumph of a dozen evil
men over American democracy and a free press. 

  

March 1, 2007 

Copyright C 2007 Creators Syndicate 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://paa-tx.org/pipermail/discuss_paa-tx.org/attachments/20070303/a338c9d5/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1587 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://paa-tx.org/pipermail/discuss_paa-tx.org/attachments/20070303/a338c9d5/attachment.gif>


More information about the Discuss mailing list