[PAA-Discuss] A new May Day
Massoud Nayeri
massoud1 at alltel.net
Thu May 3 13:13:04 EDT 2007
To "review the use of force" means absolutely nothing. The attack by police was an act of intimidation against immigrant workers and like other countries, this was a calculated political decision and was not accidental.
The 2008 May Day will answer this question.
Massoud
----- Original Message -----
From: A. Artemis
To: discuss at paa-tx.org
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 7:24 AM
Subject: Re: [PAA-Discuss] A new May Day
I wonder what "review the use of force" means: Practise firing more rubber bullets? Developing better aim? Convincing us all that rubber bullets are the new, improved, "non-lethal" upgrade over archaic bullets?
1.. Study Says Rubber Bullets Too Dangerous For Civil Crowd Control
-
commondreams.org
-
rubber bullets used by police to restrain protesters kill and maim too often to be considered a safe method of crowd control, .
Massoud Nayeri <massoud1 at alltel.net> wrote:
UNITED STATES: ... a clash in Los Angeles where officers fired rubber bullets and used batons against demonstrators. Police promised to review the use of force.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
Check out new cars at Yahoo! Autos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------
Progressive Action Alliance http://progressiveactionalliance.org/
Discuss mailing list Discuss at paa-tx.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, access the archives, or change your options on this list, go to:
http://paa-tx.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_paa-tx.org
To reply only to the person posting this note, use "Reply".
To reply so that everyone on this list receives your note, use "Reply All".
Check the "To:" field in your message, before sending, to ensure it goes to the correct address.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://paa-tx.org/pipermail/discuss_paa-tx.org/attachments/20070503/98ffb364/attachment.htm>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list