[PAA-Discuss] [helenahandbasket] Vote Nader! I'm Serious!

[Anne del Prado]

Great article, but I'm seriouser, Vote Cynthia McKinney.
AnneDate: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:50:20 -0700From: steve
--Forwarded Message Attachment--To: theworld at large.comFrom: dare2b at earthlink.netDate: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:12:25 -0700Subject: [helenahandbasket] Vote Nader! I'm Serious!Mr. Conspiracy Says...Vote Nader! I'm serious! This election's being described as historical because there's a candidate who's half black and a candidate who's at least half woman. It should also be described as historical because we get to have a legitimate president for the first time in eight years, but nobody's pushing that inconvenient truth, perhaps because they know the next president isn't going to be particularly legitimate either. (I don't remember any massive retooling of the election system in the last eight years, do you?) But it'll sure look legitimate. They're going to pretend right on down the wire that the votes counted have anything whatsoever to do with the votes submitted.  I've decided I'm voting for Ralph Nader just because everyone thinks it's so wrong, after all, he's the bastard who gave Bush the votes in Florida, right? Bullshit. That election was fixed. There was nothing Ralph Nader, Al Gore, George Jetson, or Yahweh could have done to prevent George W. Bush from stealing the presidency of the United States in 2000. Nader wasn't the spoiler, he was the patsy. There is only one power behind the Democratic and Republican parties and that's the way they want to keep it. Their entire demonic plot depends upon the two party system. If you wanted to turn the population against a three, four, five, or infinite party system, how would you do it? By demonizing Ralph Nader as the party pooper who threw the 2000 election to Bush. How convenient for everyone to forget that they recounted all the votes in Florida, even though the Supreme Court made sure it wasn't official, and GORE WON. Nader had absolutely nothing to do with the real outcome of the 2000 election.  Like the perps of 9/11, if you're smart enough to pull off such a massive con, you're smart enough to arrange it so someone else gets blamed. It's totally naive for anyone to think it was an accident that before the recount, in the FICTIONAL election results, Nader got precisely the amount of votes that would have put Gore in office. Wise up. Those election results were tabulated the week before the election to deliver the message they conveyed; Don't vote for third party candidates. It's become stuck as common knowledge, an urban myth, that Nader was the spoiler, not the voting machines. Fuck those assholes. I'm throwing away my vote for a third party candidate, probably Nader, but I'm still holding out hope for the Kucinich/Paul ticket. In any case, if you want a third party system, vote for anyone but the Democrat or Republican.  "If you don't eat yer meat, you can't have any pudding. How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat?"- Pink Floyd - http://dareland.blogspot.com __._,_.___|   Visit Your Group Star Wars on Y!Discover new contentConnect with otherfans & upload video.Yahoo! SearchStart SearchingFind everythingyou're looking for.Moderator CentralYahoo! GroupsGet the latest newsfrom the team.. __,_._,___
_________________________________________________________________
Connect and share in new ways with Windows Live.
http://www.windowslive.com/share.html?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_Wave2_sharelife_012008
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://paa-tx.org/pipermail/discuss_paa-tx.org/attachments/20080310/c3a1e9d9/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: nader_ralph 01.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 41440 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://paa-tx.org/pipermail/discuss_paa-tx.org/attachments/20080310/c3a1e9d9/attachment.jpg>