[PAA-Discuss] The Tibet Card

[Edna Thompson]

I'm glad to see that somebody besides me recognizes that if Bush supports the Tibetan monks, there must be something in it for the bourgeoisie.

While returning from China a couple years ago, I was told by a Chinese businessman from Shanghai that the Tibetan monks gripe with China dates back to 1945. When the Communist Party of China took power in 1945 one of the first things they did was to close down slavery in Tibet. The Tibetan monks were open advocates of slavery in those days and even had their own personal slaves. The CPC closed all that down and the monks have been fuming ever since.

The Dalai Lama talks a good talk, but the monks have walked a crooked walk through history. I am suspicious of any ally of Bush and/or Jean Kilpatrick.

Peace & solidarity
Pat
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ron and Kris Graham 
  To: Discuss at paa-tx.org ; Green Core ; Green Discussion List ; MANDELL at yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2008 11:51 AM
  Subject: [PAA-Discuss] The Tibet Card


  http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19626.htm

   

  The Tibet Card

  West is punishing China for its reluctance to impose sanctions on Iran

  By Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich 

  28/03/08 "ICH" -- -- During the Vietnam era, the United States eagerly supported the regime of Ngo Dinh Diem, a man who brutally oppressed the Buddhists; yet today our government has risen in defense of the Dalai Lama and Tibet. Has our sordid history finally led to compassion for the people of Tibet? One must wonder which people we want to protect for there are 41 races in Tibet, including Tibetan, Menpa, Luopa, Han Chinese, Hui, Sherpa, Deng, and so on; although by far, the majority are Tibetans. Perhaps the US is reaching out to the Dalai Lama - again? 

  It seems that the US government excels at propaganda for it continues to win over the very people it has betrayed and caused to be killed; buying their trust, it offers a friendship that is only self-serving. Oblivious to the past havoc wreaked by the CIA in Tibet, the innocent gather around the storm, stare into the eye, ready to be sucked into it. Not too long ago, the Truman administration attempted to use the young Dalai Lama against China's new Communist regime. The CIA offered to provide him financial support as part of the deal. Its subsidies to the Dalai Lama lasted, at an unspecified level, until 1974. However, the CIA officials seem to have misled the Tibetans into thinking they had American support for the establishment of an independent Tibet[i]. They did not.

  Once again, the Tibetans are thinking they have the support of the United States. It should be mentioned that such names as Tom Lantos (a Holocaust survivor) endorsed the promotion of a free Tibet. He also promoted the International Campaign for Tibet, a campaign which receives grants from the National Endowment for Democracy - a State Department operation which engages non-suspecting NGOs to openly do what the CIA did/does. Neoconservative queen, Jean Kilpatrick was pushing The Committee of 100 for Tibet with artists such as Richard Gere as unsuspecting fronts[ii] 

  What is the reason behind America's sudden interest in Tibet, the Buddhist ideology of 1649 Dalai Lama preserving animal and nature (we certainly could be preserving nature at home) or is it what is under nature? Tibet has the world's largest reserve of uranium, and in addition to gold and copper, large quantities of oil and gas were discovered in Qiangtang Basin in western China's remote Tibet area[iii]. A friendly Dalai Lama would help reimburse the CIA subsidies, and much more. 

  There are other more important factors. Israel's interest is undeniable. In fact, they have been helping this ancient green land with 'agriculture techniques' in recent years[iv]. Elie Wiesel, Nobel Laureate and Holocaust survivor, is recruiting fellow Nobel winners to press China on Tibet. Other notables such as Spielberg have already cooperated, and Sarkozy is considering boycotting the Olympics. One has to ask why these humanitarians are not concerned with the well-being of 1.4 million Palestinians described by the UN and the ICRC as being subjected to worst possible human disaster witnessed. 

  China has always shown reluctance to impose sanctions on Iran. From an Israeli and American perspective, China became a veritable short-term liability (versus a long term power challenging the US) when Iran and China engaged in talks to allow for a military base for China in one of Iran's Persian Gulf ports. This was in response to Sarkozy making an announcement that France and the UAE were negotiating a deal in which France would have a small base in that region. Such a cooperation between Iran and China would make Iran less vulnerable to an attack by Israel and/or the United States. 

  Engaging China in a Tibet uprising, threatening the public image it has worked so hard to build around the world (China has far surpassed the United States in Public Diplomacy. During the G.W. Bush presidency, while the world watched in dismay an do-it-alone America that made a blunder at every turn, China, in spite of human rights issues that remain to be resolved, has won 'hearts and minds' in South America, Middle East, and Africa. It is attempting to win over its regional neighbors by developing economic, political, and diplomatic relations, and exercising skillful diplomacy) would distract or dissuade it from building alliances with Iran. Iran must be kept isolated at all costs. 

  Tel-Aviv hopes that Cheney will push Bush to launch a military attack on Iran, just as he persuaded Bush to attack Iraq. Given that the Iraq tactics are old, new ones have to be sought. As such, many experts suspect that a false flag operation would be required to launch an all out war. In October 2006, when Anti-terrorism officials conducted a helicopter survey of New York City's radiation sources in preparation for a so-called "dirty bomb" attack, they came across an unexpected radiation hot spot which has been kept out of the media as it is a political hot spot - A strong radiation spike from the area of the Israeli Embassy. Officials would not comment on why they thought that particular area showed such a stunning peak in radiation[v]. 

  Can America afford another war? Will the world withstand another assault on humanity? 

  In 1787, George Washington said: "The power under the Constitution will always be in the people. It is entrusted for certain defined purposes, and for a certain limited period, to representatives of their own choosing; and whenever it is executed contrary to their interest, or not agreeable to their wishes, their servants can, and undoubtedly will, be recalled." 

  Let us recall our servants who do not represent us, who do not serve our interest, and who are killing in our name.

  Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich is an Iranian-American studying at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles. She is a member of World Association of International Studies society, Stanford. Her research focus is US foreign policy towards Iran, Iran's nuclear program, and influence of lobby groups. She is a peace activist, essayist, radio commentator and public speaker. 

  Notes:

  [i] Jim Mann, Los Angeles Times: Jun 16, 1999. p. 5). 

  [ii] http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/crs/RL30983.pdf  

  [iii] http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/news/nts44532.htm . 

  [iv] (http://www.tew.org/archived/agri.israeli.html 

  [v] http://cleveland.indymedia.org/news/2006/10/22798.php  

   



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  ---------------
  Progressive Action Alliance  http://progressiveactionalliance.org/
  Discuss mailing list   Discuss at paa-tx.org
  To subscribe, unsubscribe, access the archives, or change your options on this list, go to:
  http://paa-tx.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_paa-tx.org 

  To reply only to the person posting this note, use "Reply".
  To reply so that everyone on this list receives your note, use "Reply All".
  Check the "To:" field in your message, before sending, to ensure it goes to the correct address.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://paa-tx.org/pipermail/discuss_paa-tx.org/attachments/20080331/c8eeda3e/attachment.htm>