[PAA-Discuss] Never Forget: Bad Wars Aren't Possible Unless Good People Back Them ...a...

Juli3 at aol.com Juli3 at aol.com
Wed Sep 15 18:16:49 EDT 2010


Never Forget: Bad Wars Aren't Possible Unless Good People  Back Them 
Today's OpenMike blog by Michael Moore 
 
September 15, 2010  
I know we've been "free" of the Iraq War for two weeks now and our minds  
have turned to the new football season and Fashion Week in New York. And how  
exciting that the new fall TV season is just days away!  
But before we get too far away from something we would all just like to  
forget, will you please allow me to just say something plain and blunt and  
necessary:  
We invaded Iraq because most Americans -- including good liberals  like Al 
Franken, Nicholas Kristof & Bill Keller of the New York  Times, David 
Remnick of the New Yorker, the editors of the  Atlantic and the New Republic, 
Harvey Weinstein, Hillary  Clinton, Chuck Schumer and John Kerry -- wanted to.  
Of course the actual blame for the war goes to  
Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld/Wolfowitz because they ordered the "precision" bombing,  the invasion, the 
occupation, and the theft of our national treasury. I have  no doubt that history 
will record that they committed the undisputed Crime of  the (young) Century. 
 
But how did they get away with it, considering they'd lost the presidential 
 election by 543,895 votes? They also knew that the majority of the country 
 probably wouldn't back them in such a war (a Newsweek poll in October 2002 
 showed 61% thought it was "very important" for Bush to get formal approval 
 from the United Nations for war -- but that never happened). So how did 
they  pull it off?  
They did it by getting liberal voices to support their war. They did it by  
creating the look of bipartisanship. And they convinced other countries'  
leaders like Tony Blair to get on board and make it look like it wasn't just  
our intelligence agencies cooking the evidence.  
But most importantly, they made this war (and its public support) happen  
because Bush & Co. had brilliantly conned the New York Times into  running a 
bunch of phony front-page stories about how Saddam Hussein had all  these 
"weapons of mass destruction." The administration gleefully fed this  false 
information not to Fox News or the Washington  Times. They gave it to 
America's leading liberal newspaper. They must  have had a laugh riot each morning 
when they'd pick up the New York  Times and read the nearly word-for-word 
scenarios and talking points that  they had concocted in the Vice President's 
office.  
I blame the New York Times more for this war than Bush. I  expected Bush 
and Cheney to try and get away with what they  did. But the Times -- and the 
rest of the press -- was supposed to  STOP them by doing their job: Be a 
relentless watchdog of government  and business -- and then inform the public so 
we can take action.  
Instead, the New York Times gave the Bush administration the cover  they 
needed. They could -- and did -- say, 'Hey, look, even the Times  says Saddam 
has WMD!'  
With this groundwork laid, the Bush crowd ended up convincing a whopping  
70% of the public to support the war -- a public that had given him less than 
 48% of its vote in 2000.  
Early liberal support for this war was the key ingredient in selling it to  
a majority of the public. I realize this is something that no one in the 
media  -- nor most of us -- really wants to discuss. Who among us wants to 
feel the  pain of having to remember that liberals, by joining with Bush, made 
this war  happen?  
Please, before our collective memory fades, I just want us to be honest  
with ourselves and present an unsanitized version of how they pulled off this  
war. I can guarantee you the revisionists will make sure the real truth 
will  not enter the history books.  
Children born when the war began started second grade this month.  
Kids who were eleven in 2003 are now old enough to join up and get killed  
in Iraq in a "non-combat capacity."  
They'll never understand how we got here if we don't.  
So let me state this clearly: This war was aided and abetted by a) liberals 
 who were afraid to stick their necks out and thus remained silent; and b)  
liberals who actually said they believed Colin Powell's cartoon 
presentation  at the U.N. and then went against their better judgment by publicly 
offering  their support for the invasion of Iraq.  
First, there were those 29 (turncoat) Democratic senators who voted for the 
 war. Then there was the embarrassing display of reporters who couldn't 
wait to  be "embedded" and go for a joy ride on a Bradley tank.  
But my real despair lies with the people I counted on for strong opposition 
 to this madness -- but who left the rest of us alone, out on a limb, as we 
 tried to stop the war.  
In March of 2003, to be a public figure speaking out against the war was  
considered instant career suicide. Take the Dixie Chicks as Exhibit A. Their  
lead singer, Natalie Maines, uttered just one sentence of criticism -- and  
their career was effectively dead and buried at that moment. Bruce 
Springsteen  spoke out in their defense, and a Colorado DJ was fired for refusing to 
not  play their songs. That was about it. Crickets everywhere else.  
Then MSNBC fired the only nightly critic of the war -- the television  
legend, Phil Donahue. No one at the network -- or any network -- spoke up on  
his behalf. There would never again be a Phil Donahue show. (Little did GE  
know that, when they soon filled that 8pm hour with a sports guy by the name  
of Keith Olbermann, they would end up with the war's most brilliant and  
fiercest critic, night after night after night.) There were a few others --  
Bill Maher, Janeane Garofalo, Tim Robbins and Seymour Hersh -- who weren't  
afraid to speak the truth. But where was everyone else? Where were all those  
supposed liberal voices in the media?  
Instead, this is what we were treated to back in 2003 and 2004:  
** Al Franken, who said he "reluctantly" was "a supporter  of the war 
against Saddam." And six months into the war Al was still saying,  "There were 
reasons to go to war against Iraq ... I was very ambivalent about  it but I 
still don't know if it was necessarily wrong (to go to war)."  
** Nicholas Kristof, columnist for the New York  Times, who attacked me and 
wrote a column comparing me to the nutty  right-wingers who claimed Hillary 
had Vince Foster killed. He said people like  me were "polarizing the 
political cesspool," and he chastised anyone who dared  call Bush's reasons for 
going to war in Iraq "lies."  
** Howell Raines, editor-in-chief of the "liberal" New  York Times, who 
was, according to former Times editor Doug  Frantz, "eager to have articles 
that supported the war-mongering out of  Washington ... He discouraged pieces 
that were at odds with the  administration's position on Iraq's supposed 
weapons of mass destruction and  alleged links of al-Qaeda." The book "Hard 
News" reported that "according to  half a dozen sources within the Times, Raines 
wanted to prove once  and for all that he wasn't editing the paper in a way 
that betrayed his  liberal beliefs..."  
** Bill Keller, at the time a New York Times  columnist, who wrote: "We 
reluctant hawks may disagree among ourselves about  the most compelling logic 
for war -- protecting America, relieving oppressed  Iraqis or reforming the 
Middle East -- but we generally agree that the logic  for standing pat does 
not hold. ... we are hard pressed to see an alternative  that is not built on 
wishful thinking."  
(The New York Times is so left-wing that when Raines retired, they  
replaced him with... Keller.)  
** The New Yorker, the magazine for really smart  liberals, found its 
editor-in-chief, David Remnick,  supporting the war on its pages: "History will 
not easily excuse us if, by  deciding not to decide, we defer a reckoning 
with an aggressive totalitarian  leader who intends not only to develop weapons 
of mass destruction but also to  use them. ... a return to a hollow pursuit 
of containment will be the most  dangerous option of all." (To cover its 
ass, the New Yorker had  another editor, Rick Hertzberg, write an anti-war 
editorial as a rebuttal.)   
Some of the above have recanted their early support of the war. The  Times 
fired its WMD correspondent and apologized to its readers. Al  Franken has 
been a great Senator. Kristof now writes nice columns (_check out last  
Sunday's_ (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/12/opinion/12kristof.html) ).  
But the support of the war by these leading liberals and the majority of  
the Democrats in the Senate made it safe for the Right to let loose a vicious 
 and unchecked tirade of hate and threats on anyone (including myself) who  
dared to step out of line. It was not uncommon to hear the media describe 
me  as "un-American," "anti-American," "aiding the terrorists," and being a  
"traitor."  
Here are just a couple of examples of what was said about me over the  
airwaves by two of the nation's leading conservative commentators:  
"Let me just tell you what I'm thinking. I'm thinking about killing Michael 
 Moore, and I'm wondering if I could kill him myself, or if I would need to 
 hire somebody to do it. No, I think I could. I think he could be looking 
me in  the eye, you know, and I could just be choking the life out -- is this 
wrong?  I stopped wearing my 'What Would Jesus Do' band, and I've lost all 
sense of  right and wrong now. I used to be able to say, 'Yeah, I'd kill 
Michael Moore,'  and then I'd see the little band: 'What Would Jesus Do?' And 
then I'd realize,  'Oh, you wouldn't kill Michael Moore. Or at least you 
wouldn't choke him to  death.' And you know, well, I'm not sure." (Glenn Beck)  
And:  
"Well, I want to kill Michael Moore. Is that all right? All right. And I  
don't believe in capital punishment. That's just a joke on Moore." (Bill  
O'Reilly)  
(Ironically, O'Reilly made his threat/joke the night after Janet Jackson's  
breast was bared at the Super Bowl -- which got CBS fined over half a 
million  dollars because, you know, nipples are far more frightening than death  
threats.)  
So that's how I'll personally remember the early war years: living with a  
real and present danger caused by the hate whipped up by right-wing radio 
and  TV. (I've been advised not to recount certain specific incidents that 
happened  to me, as it would only encourage other crazy people.)  
So I dealt with it. And I'm still here. And I know many of you went through 
 your own crap, standing up against the war at school, or work, or at  
Thanksgiving dinner, taking your own blows for simply saying what was the  
truth.  
But how much easier it would have been for all of us if the liberal  
establishment had stood with us? We didn't own a daily newspaper, or a  magazine 
with a circulation in the millions. We didn't have our own TV show or  
network. We weren't invited on shows like "Meet the Press," because they  simply 
could not allow our voice to be heard.  
The media watchdog group FAIR reported that in the three weeks after the  
war started, the CBS Evening News allowed only one anti-war voice on their  
show -- and that was on one night in one soundbite (and that  was four 
seconds of me in a line from my Oscar speech) -- even though in March  of 2003 our 
anti-war numbers were in the millions (remember the huge  demonstrations in 
hundreds of cities?). We were around 30% of the country  according to most 
polls (that's nearly 100 million Americans!) and yet we had  no way to 
communicate with each other aside from through the Nation  and a few websites 
like _CommonDreams.org_ (http://www.commondreams.org/)  and _Truth-Out.org_ 
(http://www.truth-out.org/) .  
But that was no way to build a huge mass movement of Middle Americans to  
oppose the war. Unless you had just lucked out and been handed an Oscar on  
live television in front of a gazillion people where you had 45 seconds to 
say  something before they cut you off and booed you off the stage (_hahahaha_ 
(http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xhbzq_michael-moore-oscar-speech_music) 
),  you had no public platform. (Jeez, I sure did get booed a lot that year:  
simply walking through an airport, or eating dinner in a restaurant, or  
sitting at a Laker game where they suddenly put me up on the Jumbotron and the 
 place went so angry-crazy that Larry David, who was sitting next to me, 
felt  that maybe for his own safety he should perhaps slide a few seats down 
or go  get us a couple of wieners. Instead, he stuck by my side -- and his 
skillful  ninja moves got us out of there alive after the game.)  
I know it's hard to remember, but when this war started, there was no 
_YouTube_ (http://www.youtube.com/mmflint) , no _Facebook_ 
(http://www.facebook.com/mmflint) , no _Twitter_ (http://twitter.com/mmflint) , no way for you to 
bypass the  media lords so you could have your own friggin' say.  
Too bad for the bastards, those days are over.  
The next time around, it won't be so easy to shut up a country girl band or 
 try to silence someone while he accepts his little gold statue -- or  
completely ignore the millions of citizens in the streets.  
So now we can hope that one of our wars is over. Too bad we lost. I hate to 
 lose, don't you? But the fact is, we lost the very day we invaded a  
sovereign nation that posed absolutely no threat to us and had nothing to do  
with 9/11. We lost lives (over 4,400 of ours, hundreds of thousands of  
theirs), we lost limbs (a total of 35,000 troops came back with various wounds  and 
disabilities and God knows how many more with mental problems). We lost  
the money our grandchildren were supposed to live on.  
And we lost our soul, who we were, what we stood for as a once-great  
country -- lost it all. Can we now ask for redemption -- for forgiveness? Can  we 
be... "America" again?  
I guess we'll see. The vast majority of the country eventually came around  
to the Dixie Chicks' position. And we elected an anti-Iraq-war guy by the 
name  of Barack Hussein Obama.  
But, please, promise yourselves never to forget how our country went crazy  
7 1/2 years ago -- even though, to many people at the time, it seemed  
completely normal. And I'm here to tell you, no matter how much better it's  
gotten, no matter how normal you may think things are now, we're still halfway  
nuts. Just listen to the new batch of "sensible pundits" as they start to 
beat  the drums about what we should do to Iran. One war down, one (or two or 
three)  to go.  
C'mon, Mr. President, not one more kid needs to die overseas wearing a  
uniform with our flag on it. We can't win like this. Let's dig a few thousand  
wells in Afghanistan, build a few free mosques, leave behind some food and  
clothing, fix their electrical grid, issue an apology and set up a Facebook  
page so they can stay in touch with us -- and then let's get the hell out. 
_Your  own National Security Advisor_ 
(http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/president-obamas-secret-100-al-qaeda-now-afghanistan/story?id=9227861)  and _your 
CIA Director_ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XIb7uD90POU)  have  told you 
there are less than 100 al-Qaeda fighters in the entire country.  100???  
100,000 U.S. troops going after 100 al-Qaeda? Is this a Looney Tunes  
presentation? "A-ba-dee-a-ba-dee-a-ba-dee -- That's All Folks!" Let's  get real. 
I'm glad one war is "over." But I know how we got there -- and I'm  willing 
now to fight just as hard to stop these other wars if you won't, Mr.  Obama. 
 
Your call.  
Yours,  
Michael Moore
_Mike at MichaelMoore.com_ (mailto:Mike at MichaelMoore.com) 
_MichaelMoore.com_ (http://www.michaelmoore.com/)   
P.S. Just a thought, Mr. President. Can I ask that you go back and watch  
this movie I made -- "Fahrenheit 9/11." There might be some answers there. I  
give you my permission to download it for free by going to this site: 
_TorrentHound.com_ 
(http://www.torrenthound.com/hash/6cf21be0af1d3195a69cccfe1520f833a5928f19/torrent-info/Fahrenheit-9-11-2004-DVDRip-Eng) .  Don't tell the 
studio I said it was ok! They've only made a half a billion $$  on it so 
far.  
P.P.S. To everyone on my list: Thanks to your thousands of generous  
donations, we've raised over $60,000 for the Muslim community center near  Ground 
Zero. This has made news around the world, that there are Americans who  
believe in our stated American principles.  
--------------------------------  
The second part of Mike's interview with Wolf Blitzer will air today on  
CNN's _The Situation Room_ (http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/situation.room/)   
(5-7pm ET).  
Also: _Bill Maher_ (http://www.hbo.com/real-time-with-bill-maher)  has 
asked  Mike to be his first guest of his new season this Friday at 10pm ET on 
HBO.  


_Join Mike's Mailing  List_ (http://www.michaelmoore.com/visitor/register)  
| _Follow Mike on Twitter_ (http://twitter.com/mmflint)  | _Join Mike's 
Facebook Group_ (http://www.facebook.com/mmflint)  | _Become Mike's MySpace 
Friend_ (http://www.myspace.com/mmflint)   
    You are currently subscribed to michaelmoore as:  juli3 at aol.com 
Add maillist at michaelmoore.com to your email address  book to ensure 
delivery 
_Forward  to a Friend_ 
(http://go.netatlantic.com/subscribe/forwardtoafriend.tml?m=37861504.e63d12a6ee0ffff97f312314b560559e&o=23804490)   |  _Manage  
Subscription_ 
(http://go.netatlantic.com/subscribe/managesubscription.tml?m=37861504.e63d12a6ee0ffff97f312314b560559e)   |   


_Subscribe_ 
(http://go.netatlantic.com/read/all_forums/subscribe?name=michaelmoore)   |   _Unsubscribe_ 
(http://go.netatlantic.com/u?id=37861504.e63d12a6ee0ffff97f312314b560559e&n=T&l=michaelmoore&o=23804490)   
 (http://www.netatlantic.com/learnmore/?list=michaelmoore&server=go) 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://paa-tx.org/pipermail/discuss_paa-tx.org/attachments/20100915/bdc47459/attachment.htm>


More information about the Discuss mailing list