[PAA-Discuss] U.S. Invasion of Libya Set for October

Thu Jun 16 08:18:26 EDT 2011

U.S.
Invasion of Libya Set for October

Aaron Dykes
June 15, 2011

Infowars.com has received alarming reports from within the ranks
of military stationed at Ft. Hood, Texas confirming plans to initiate
a full-scale U.S.-led ground invasion in Libya and deploy troops by
October.
The source stated that additional Special Forces are headed to
Libya in July, with the 1st Calvary Division (heavy armor) and three
corps deploying in late October and early November. Initial numbers
are estimated at 12,000 active forces and another 15,000 in support,
totaling nearly 30,000 troops. 

This information was confirmed by numerous calls and e-mails from
other military personnel, some indicating large troop deployment as
early as September. Among these supporting sources is a British
S.A.S. officer confirming that U.S. Army Rangers are already in
Libya. The chatter differs in the details, but the overall
convergence is clear– that a full-on war is emerging this fall as
Gaddafi continues to evade attempts to remove him from power.

A caller identified as “Specialist H” working for mortuary
affairs under USCENTCOM revealed that there have already been
American casualties inside Libya. He confirmed that at least 2
soldiers and 3 civilians have died from combat bullet wounds,
something the media has yet to report, and needs to investigate and
address.
Geo-political expert Dr. Webster Tarpley also told the Alex Jones
Show today that wider war is being planned for Libya, while the count
of simultaneous U.S. wars has reached five conflicts– including
Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya and Yemen. The potential for an
even greater spread of regional conflict could well provoke a World
War III scenario, drawing in tenuous nations like Syria, Lebanon,
Iran or even Saudi Arabia, according to Tarpley.
For his part, President
Obama has brushed off demands to answer to Congress for
continuing military action beyond the 60
day limit set under the war
powers act. The engagement he first claimed would be over in mere
days, Obama then dubbed a “kinetic action” rather than a war.
Further, Obama has justified his commitment of American forces under
a United
Nations mandate, unconcerned by his own admission with the will
of Congress. Now, with significant overlap in reports, we can confirm
an apparent decision by Obama to support wider war and a longer-term
involvement in Libya.
Watch
the video below:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35ndI5Z0C2A&feature=player_embeded

Webster
Tapley: NATO Running Out of Bombs in Libya, Overstretch with Five War
in 3 parts
Pt1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qxtpqunhQw&feature=channel_video_title

Pt2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3b31tiXkik

Pt3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUNhXNPZyB4

http://www.infowars.com/u-s-invasion-of-libya-set-for-october/

"Of
all the enemies to public liberty, war is perhaps, the most to be

dreaded because it comprises and develops the germ of every
other. 
War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts
and taxes …
known instruments for bringing the many under the
domination of the few.…
No
nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare."

--James Madison

The
Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism
It
does not matter if the war is not real, or when it is real, it does
not matter if victory is not possible.....The
war is not meant to be won, it is meant to be continuous.....The
essential act of modern warfare is the destruction of the produce of
human labor.... A
hierarchial society is only possible on the basis of poverty
and ignorance...In principle the war effort is
always planned to keep society on the brink of starvation.....The
war is waged by the ruling group against it's own subjects,
and it's object is not victory over Eurasia or East Asia ( or Korea,
Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan; or now LIBYA, YEMEN, PAKISTAN, then SYRIA
leading to IRAN ) but to keep the very structure of society intact.

George
Orwell
1984

http://www.WarIsARacket.com

We live in a
Welfare/Warfare/Wall
Street State.
I'd
like to share two Great Myths of the false left-right paradigm of the
twin wings of the Ruling Party that I have discovered over the course
of my awakening and independent studies. I think that they can help
begin to explain why our world is on the precipice of annihilation
and subjugation by totalitarian government.

Myth
#1: Fascism and communism are polar opposites.
They
are both branches of the same Marxist tree--and this Myth has been
thoroughly discredited by a great many scholars
and intellectuals.
For an exceptional examination of this very subject, check out the
insightful documentary film "The Soviet
Story".
http://www.veoh.com/browse/videos/category/news/watch/v19964362qTTd86Zf

The
powerful elite want us to argue based on a Right vs. Left theory. The
right extreme being Facism and the Left extreme being Communism.
Either way, those in power retain power. They really don't care if it
is right or left.

Our founding fathers looked at a different
political spectrum. One that had Tyranny (the antithesis of Liberty
and Freedom- 1984 like)  as an extreme;  and Anarchy ( Mad Max or
Road Warrior) as the other. They were looking to forge a system that
had just enough “control”  to keep us out of the chaos or Anarchy
but to err on the side of Liberty and Freedom..

I invite you
to realize, if you focus on the Tyranny/Anarchy paradigm while
focusing on Freedom and Liberty, then all the garbage that we see on
a daily basis on right vs. left is moot since both sides have their
way of slowly revoking our Liberties and Freedoms. We let them revoke
our freedoms only if it is a leader from our
team.
The left like war only
when their leader is in office (Bosnia/Afghanistan). The right hate
government intervention unless
their leader is in the office (Patriot Act).

We've probably
all been guilty when it comes to rooting only for my
team, or as we commonly say it "the lesser of two evils"
(which is still evil).
The Left/Right
Paradigm, is a way of keeping Americans away from thinking for
themselve's.  There is no talk about our founding fathers in congress
these days, except from a few Constitutionalists. Our founding
fathers hated the idea of The Parties; People fighting and picking
sides, instead of following whats really important, The Constitution.

Myth
#2: Only leftists are opposed to interventionist war, the
police/surveillance state, and completely arbitrary violations of the
Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Today,
to espouse a non-interventionist foreign policy is to commit the
alleged sin of "isolationism" according to the grand
mentioners in the media, intelligentsia, and government "leaders"
and/or to identify oneself as a so-called left-liberal. Yet, the real
diplomatic isolationists are those that perpetuate an interventionist
foreign policy of agressive, undeclared war, empire, and arbitrary
abuses of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The real right is
in favor of the absence of these abusive and dictatorial government
powers and the presence of justice according to nature's law.

Foreign
Relations, the Dangers of Permanent Foreign Alliances, and Free Trade
George Washington dedicated a large part of his farewell address
	to discussing foreign relations, and the dangers of permanent
	alliances between the United States and foreign nations. This issue
	had taken special prominence in American politics during conflict
	between France and Britain, known as the French
	Revolutionary Wars, and the efforts of the Federalists to join
	sides with Britain and the efforts of the Democratic-Republicans to
	convince Washington to honor the 1778
	Treaty of Alliance, which established the Franco-American
	alliance, and aid France. Washington had avoided American
	involvement in the conflict by issuing the Proclamation
	of Neutrality,
	which in turn led to the Neutrality
	Act of 1794. He clearly tries to further explain his approach to
	foreign policy and alliances in this portion of the address.
Once again making reference to proper behavior based upon
religious doctrine and morality,
Washington advocates a policy of good
faith and justice towards all nations, and urges the American
people to avoid long-term friendly relations or rivalries with any
nation. He argues these attachments and animosity toward nations will
only cloud the government's judgment in its foreign policy.
 Washington argued that longstanding poor relations will only lead
to unnecessary wars due to a tendency to blow minor offenses out of
proportion when committed by nations viewed as enemies of the United
States. He continues this argument by claiming that alliances are
likely to draw the United States into wars which have no
justification and no benefit to the country beyond simply defending
the favored nation. Washington continues his warning on alliances by
claiming that they often lead to poor relations with nations who feel
that they are not being treated as well as America's allies, and
threaten to influence the American government into making decisions
based upon the will of their allies instead of the will of the
American people.
Washington makes an extended reference to the dangers of foreign
nations who will seek to influence the American people and
government. He makes a point to say that he believes both nations who
may be considered friendly as well as nations considered enemies will
try to influence the government to do their will and it will only be
"real patriots"
who ignore popular opinion and resist the influence of friendly
nations to seek what is best for their own country. It is likely that
Washington's own experience during the Citizen
Genêt affair, when a French diplomat traveled to America raising
militias to attack
Spanish lands, privateers
to seize British ships, and rallies to sway American opinion in favor
of an alliance with France against Washington's orders to stop his
activities in the interest of American neutrality.
Washington went to great length to urge the American people to
take advantage of their independent  position in the world, and avoid
attachments and entanglements in foreign
affairs, especially those of Europe ( and especially Great
Britain), which he argues have little or nothing to do with the
interests of America. He argues that it makes no sense for the
American people to wage war on European soil when their isolated
position and unity will allow them to remain neutral and focus on
their own affairs. As a result, Washington argues that the country
should avoid permanent alliance with all foreign nations, although
temporary alliances during times of extreme danger may be necessary,
but does say that current treaties should be honored although not
extended.
Washington wraps up his foreign policy stance by advocating free
trade with all nations arguing that trade links should be
established naturally and the role of the government should be
limited to insuring stable trade, defending the rights of American
merchants, and
any provisions necessary to insure that the government is able to
insure the conventional rules of trade.

Message body

Ron Paul for President 2012

http://RonPaul2012.com
NULLIFY 
http://TenthAmendmentCenter.com

Bad criminals go to jail, the best go to Washington

http://FireCongress.org

How Will You Eat When the Dollar Crashes? Get FREE FOOD NOW!

http://swampfox.efoodsglobal.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://paa-tx.org/pipermail/discuss_paa-tx.org/attachments/20110616/f7feb8b8/attachment.htm>