<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:st1="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style>
<![endif]--><o:SmartTagType
namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" name="State"/>
<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name="City"/>
<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name="country-region"/>
<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name="place"/>
<o:SmartTagType namespaceuri="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
name="PersonName"/>
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) }
</style>
<![endif]-->
<style>
<!--#ACTIVITY
{float:left;}
#activity SPAN:first-child {
TEXT-TRANSFORM: uppercase
}
.ATTACH
{DISPLAY: table
;}
DIV.file-title A:hover {
TEXT-DECORATION: none
}
DIV.photo-title A:hover {
TEXT-DECORATION: none
}
o {
FONT-SIZE: 0px
}
#PHOTOS div
{float:left;}
#PHOTOS div div
{overflow:hidden;}
#PHOTOS div label
{overflow:hidden;}
#ygrp-actbar DIV A:first-child {
PADDING-RIGHT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 2px
}
#ygrp-mlmsg * {
LINE-HEIGHT: 1.22em
}
#ygrp-vital UL LI:unknown {
BORDER-RIGHT: medium none
}
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Comic Sans MS";
panose-1:3 15 7 2 3 3 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Verdana;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
h3
{mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:13.5pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
font-weight:bold;}
h4
{mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
font-weight:bold;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{color:#1E66AE;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:#1E66AE;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
code
{font-family:"Courier New";}
pre
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";}
tt
{font-family:"Courier New";}
p.yiv56050417msonormal, li.yiv56050417msonormal, div.yiv56050417msonormal
{mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
p.attach, li.attach, div.attach
{mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:9.0pt;
font-family:Arial;}
p.bold, li.bold, div.bold
{mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial;
font-weight:bold;}
p.green, li.green, div.green
{mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
color:#628C2A;}
p.replbq, li.replbq, div.replbq
{margin:3.0pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
p.ad, li.ad, div.ad
{mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
p.underline, li.underline, div.underline
{mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
p.ad1, li.ad1, div.ad1
{mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
p.ad2, li.ad2, div.ad2
{mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:7.5pt;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
p.underline1, li.underline1, div.underline1
{mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
text-decoration:underline;}
span.yshortcuts1
{font-family:Verdana;
font-weight:bold;}
span.yshortcuts2
{font-family:Verdana;
font-weight:normal;}
span.EmailStyle33
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Comic Sans MS";
color:black;
font-weight:bold;
font-style:normal;
text-decoration:none none;}
p.avgcert, li.avgcert, div.avgcert
{mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
span.EmailStyle37
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Comic Sans MS";
color:black;
font-weight:bold;
font-style:normal;
text-decoration:none none;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body bgcolor=white lang=EN-US link="#1E66AE" vlink="#1E66AE">
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><font size=2 color=black face="Comic Sans MS"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Comic Sans MS";color:black;font-weight:
bold'>Well, Glory Hallelujah! Somebody else thinks like we do, Robert! Who in
the hell IS Julian Assange really? You and I spoke this morning during
Democracy NOW and it struck me that Amy Goodman was poking and prodding Assange’s
lawyer about how Assange was protecting himself and what he was busy working on
and if that work involved thousands of more “leaks” to be
disseminated widely. Juan Gonzales stated flat out that Assange was hiding
somewhere in the <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">UK</st1:place></st1:country-region>!
I almost shit my pants! To the lawyer’s credit, she remained calm and her
speech was very measured. She didn’t give away a single thing. Did Amy
and Juan think she was just going to flat out tell them where Assange was holed
up!? LOL! What’s the angle here by Goodman/Gonzales and Assange anyway??
You know as well as I do that the Ford Foundation has CIA ties, and the Ford
Foundation contributes monies to the <st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Pacifica</st1:place></st1:City>
Foundation. This tells me there is gate keeping going on. You and I also cock
an eyebrow to the fact that Assange doesn’t seem interested at all in “false
conspiracy theories” like 9/11. Hmmmmmm………………….who
is Mr. Assange beholden to, I wonder? Is he a Zionist? Does he have some sort
of relationship with the Israeli Mossad and Binyamin Netanyahu? If the Israelis
wanted to find his skinny ass they could and they would. They are some ruthless
and cunning bastards. Look at the dead nuclear scientists in <st1:country-region
w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Iran</st1:place></st1:country-region>. Some
reports state that the hits could have come from somebody within <st1:country-region
w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Iran</st1:place></st1:country-region>, however,
I am more inclined to believe it was either elements in the CIA or the Mossad
that put those magnet bombs on the cars of those scientists and blew them up. <o:p></o:p></span></font></b></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><font size=2 color=black face="Comic Sans MS"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Comic Sans MS";color:black;font-weight:
bold'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></b></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><font size=2 color=black face="Comic Sans MS"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Comic Sans MS";color:black;font-weight:
bold'>The plot thickens………………..<o:p></o:p></span></font></b></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><font size=2 color=black face="Comic Sans MS"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Comic Sans MS";color:black;font-weight:
bold'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></b></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><font size=2 color=black face="Comic Sans MS"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Comic Sans MS";color:black;font-weight:
bold'>Kris<o:p></o:p></span></font></b></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><font size=2 color=black face="Comic Sans MS"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Comic Sans MS";color:black;font-weight:
bold'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></b></p>
<div>
<div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><font size=3
face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>
<hr size=2 width="100%" align=center tabindex=-1>
</span></font></div>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><font size=2 face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold'>From:</span></font></b><font size=2
face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'> robert
[mailto:gram.graham@sbcglobal.net] <br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> Thursday, December 02, 2010
9:28 AM<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b> graham2639@mindspring.com; <st1:PersonName
w:st="on">HoustonPF@yahoogroups.com</st1:PersonName>; 'PAA';
notinourname@yahoogroups.com; guerrillatheatrebrigade@yahoogroups.com<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Cc:</span></b> 'Ken Freeland'; 'Julianne
Gustafson-Lira'; 'Bart Boyce'<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> RE: [PAA-Discuss]
[HoustonPF] Re: Ho Hum: More Wikileaks"Chickenfeed"</span></font><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=2 color=blue face=Arial><span style='font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:blue'><a
href="http://palestinethinktank.com/2010/12/01/tariq-shadid-wikileaks-leaks-toxic-acid-in-every-direction-except-to-israel/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+PalestineThinkTank+%28Palestine+Think+Tank%29">http://palestinethinktank.com/2010/12/01/tariq-shadid-wikileaks-leaks-toxic-acid-in-every-direction-except-to-israel/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+PalestineThinkTank+%28Palestine+Think+Tank%29</a></span></font><font
size=2 color=black face=Arial><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;
color:black'>Let us ponder for a second about the meaning of 'leaking'. When
something is leaking, it is usually understood that some fluid substance that
is supposed to be flowing in a certain direction, is escaping from its designed
route because of a defect in the structure that was built to guide it. Usually,
if you have a leaking pipe in your water system, your main problem is that you
are unable to control the flow of it, and water goes into directions where you
don't want it to be going.</span></font><font size=2 color=blue face=Arial><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:blue'> <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 color=blue face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt;
color:blue'>However, the definition of 'Wikileaking' seems to be following
entirely different laws of nature. Indeed, the information is flowing away from
the secret pipelines it was originally guided into. However, the strange thing about
'Wikileaking' is that <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Israel</st1:place></st1:country-region>,
a country widely known for its secret dealings and cunning intelligence
service, is managing to keep dry feet in spite of the massive political
flooding allegedly caused by Wikileaks' founding father, Julian Assange.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 color=blue face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt;
color:blue'>The lack of control that is so typical of other forms of 'leaking',
certainly does not seem to apply to 'Wikileaking' – instead it looks like
it is under perfect control, and carefully guided in such a way that it only
serves the interests of one state, namely that of Israel.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><strong><b><font size=3 color=blue face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt;color:blue'>Assange takes a leak, the world jumps up</span></font></b></strong><font
color=blue><span style='color:blue'><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 color=blue face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt;
color:blue'>Barely a country in the world that is actively involved in <st1:place
w:st="on">Middle East</st1:place> and other international affairs, either by
choice or by geographical location, has been spared by Assange's latest opening
of his Pandora's box of revelations. It is hard to visit a news source these
days, without the word 'Wikileaks' jumping into your view at least once, and
revealing some scandalous backdoor deal, secret agreement or embarrassing
hidden relationship between governments who on the surface seem to be
diametrically opposed to each other in the political spectrum.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 color=blue face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt;
color:blue'>Since the list of countries that have faced these embarrassments
includes Obama's <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">United
States</st1:place></st1:country-region>, many anti-imperialist activists
around the world have been anxiously awaiting the latest leaks, and are now
engaging in discussions about the implications of many of these so-called
astounding revelations. Julian Assange is being hailed worldwide by people who
are critical of their governments as the activist who was able to embarrass
governments, helped only by a small group of independent supporters. His star
is rising rapidly, and although sounds of cynicism can be heard here and there,
the overwhelming noise resounding in progressive circles is one of loud cheers
for this long-awaited 'champion of the ordinary man'.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 color=blue face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt;
color:blue'>What many seem to fail to be noticing however, is that although the
list of countries that were painfully embarrassed by the publication of their
secret cables, memo's and meetings, includes the Palestinian Authority, Saudi
Arabia and other Gulf states, Egypt and the United States – where Obama
is suffering from serious problems from a 'Tea Party' he was not invited to
– one of the main actors in the dirty political game of Middle East
animosities and alliances is remaining completely unharmed: Israel.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><strong><b><font size=3 color=blue face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt;color:blue'>Much ado about old news</span></font></b></strong><font
color=blue><span style='color:blue'><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 color=blue face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt;
color:blue'>What are Wikileaks telling us? That <st1:country-region w:st="on">Saudi
Arabia</st1:country-region> poured oil on the flames against <st1:country-region
w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Iran</st1:place></st1:country-region>? We
already knew that. That Abbas' administration as well as the Egyptian
government were very well informed about <st1:country-region w:st="on">Israel</st1:country-region>'s
genocidal military assault on <st1:City w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Gaza</st1:place></st1:City>
in the winter of 2009? There is nothing new about that either. The list goes on
and on, and the main victims of embarrassment are leaders of Arab governments.
But what is so new about that? Doesn't almost every Arab in the world who reads
newspapers, watches Al Jazeera and has a certain degree of understanding of <st1:place
w:st="on">Middle East</st1:place> politics, already know about the extent and
scope of secret relations in the region? Even many people living outside of the
Arab world are largely aware of this.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 color=blue face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt;
color:blue'>Oana Lungescu, spokeswoman for NATO, called Wikileaks' revelations
about the presence of American nuclear missiles in Europe – mainly the <st1:country-region
w:st="on">Netherlands</st1:country-region>, <st1:country-region w:st="on">Belgium</st1:country-region>
and <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Germany</st1:place></st1:country-region>
– 'dangerous' on November 29. Why exactly would something be dangerous,
if it is a commonly known fact that has now only been confirmed yet again?
Didn't earlier revelations have no effect, so why would these new ones do that?
Does the fact that Obama, Sarkozy, and the Chinese leadership all have
condemned Wikileaks and its founder, make any significant difference?<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 color=blue face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt;
color:blue'>The answer to these questions is: yes, these revelations are indeed
causing unpleasant domestic situations all around the world, and creating
electoral problems and other political embarrassments for governments
everywhere – except in one place, namely <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place
w:st="on">Israel</st1:place></st1:country-region>.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><strong><b><font size=3 color=blue face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt;color:blue'>No worries: Assange will tell you who to
trust</span></font></b></strong><font color=blue><span style='color:blue'><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=1 color=blue face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:7.5pt;
color:blue'>Julian Assange, 'master revealer' of international conspiracies,
apparently also is highly irritated by people questioning the events of 9/11.
In an interview in the Belfast Telegraph on July 19, 2010, he was asked about</span></font><font
color=blue><span style='color:blue'> the 9/11 attack, and answered: "I'm
constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as
9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass
financial fraud."<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 color=blue face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt;
color:blue'>Apparently Julian 'Robin Hood' Assange finds the story of pilots
who fly an airplane full of people straight into a humongous skyscraper full of
unsuspecting citizens, just because some hysterical hijacker is holding a
box-cutter against their jugular veins, perfectly believable. He apparently
also believes that when you fly an airplane into the top floors of one of the
world's largest buildings, in a horizontal direction, the building will not
only spontaneously collapse all the way down to its basement in a vertical
direction, but will indeed be transformed into a powdery dust, not leaving
behind even one piece of debris that is larger than a ballpoint pen –
except of course the completely undamaged passport of one of the alleged
hijackers, that was miraculously found among the ruins of the World Trade
Center.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 color=blue face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt;
color:blue'>Unless you, dear reader, also believe in fairy tales, this should
certainly make you wonder. So much for your credibility, mr Assange.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><strong><b><font size=3 color=blue face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt;color:blue'>Cui Bono?</span></font></b></strong><font
color=blue><span style='color:blue'><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 color=blue face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt;
color:blue'>In politics there is a golden rule for understanding what may be
the driving force behind unexpected mysterious events. This rule is known as
'Cui Bono', which is Latin for: 'who benefits?'<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 color=blue face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt;
color:blue'>Browse through all the news sources available on the latest
Wikileaks revelation, and try to find even only one revelation that actually
damages Israel, even though so many of the revealed documents are directly or
indirectly connected to Middle East politics, and to a large extent to Israeli
affairs. Did you find any document among them that either creates difficulties
for the government of the zionist entity, or even slightly embarrasses it?
Think about it well, you will find that the answer is a very simple
"No".<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 color=blue face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt;
color:blue'>Does it not strike you as interesting or remarkable, that many of
the revelations about Middle East affairs are of direct benefit to <st1:country-region
w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Israel</st1:place></st1:country-region>? If it
hasn't, read them again, and give it some thought.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 color=blue face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt;
color:blue'>Cui bono? <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Israel</st1:place></st1:country-region>.
Therefore, who is the prime suspect behind the phenomenon 'Julian Assange'? You
tell me, or just prove me wrong by showing me one Wikileaks document that would
make Binjamin Netanyahu and his rogue companions scratch their heads, or even
become only slightly uncomfortable. My suspicion grows stronger every day, and
is not deterred by Interpol's announcement on December 1 that Julian Assange is
wanted for an alleged sexual harassment case in <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place
w:st="on">Sweden</st1:place></st1:country-region>. It is obvious that he is a
man who has angered many people of power, regardless of whether he is actually
guilty in that harassment case or not. The problem however is that none of
these people of power are Israeli, and that says a lot. You never bite the hand
that feeds you, do you, Julian?<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><font size=3
face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>
<hr size=2 width="100%" align=center tabIndex=-1>
</span></font></div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><b><font size=2 face=Tahoma><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold'>From:</span></font></b><font
size=2 face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'>
discuss-bounces@paa-tx.org [mailto:discuss-bounces@paa-tx.org] <b><span
style='font-weight:bold'>On Behalf Of </span></b><st1:PersonName w:st="on">Ron
and Kris Graham</st1:PersonName><br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> Thursday, December 02, 2010
7:01 AM<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b> <st1:PersonName w:st="on">HoustonPF@yahoogroups.com</st1:PersonName>;
'PAA'; notinourname@yahoogroups.com; guerrillatheatrebrigade@yahoogroups.com<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Cc:</span></b> 'Ken Freeland'; 'Julianne
Gustafson-Lira'; 'Bart Boyce'<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> Re: [PAA-Discuss] [HoustonPF]
Re: Ho Hum: More Wikileaks"Chickenfeed"</span></font><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><font size=2 color=black face="Comic Sans MS"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Comic Sans MS";color:black;font-weight:
bold'>How do you know that many documents about <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region
w:st="on">Israel</st1:country-region></st1:place> are coming, Eric? Where are
you getting the number 4,000 in regard to <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region
w:st="on">Nepal</st1:country-region></st1:place>? Cite your sources. Look,
Eric, 9/11 was the catalyst that got the ball rolling on all the criminality
that has occurred these last 9+ years. The <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region
w:st="on">U.S.</st1:country-region></st1:place> never had any credibility to
begin with. People all over the world know that the <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region
w:st="on">United States</st1:country-region></st1:place> government sanctioned
torture, kidnapping, murder, looting and all kinds of ill shit. Anybody paying
attention in this country and abroad realized a long time ago even before 9/11
that the <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">United States</st1:country-region></st1:place>
was not the shining city on the hill. Even so called progressives here in <st1:place
w:st="on"><st1:City w:st="on">Houston</st1:City></st1:place> and elsewhere are
inclined to put the events of 9/11 to bed and just forget about them. 9/11 was
the biggest terrorist attack in U.S. history, and yet people seem willing to
stick their heads in the sand and not question who was really at fault for
those 3,000 deaths. That event was responsible for beginning the never ending
war on terror and the repression of people in the <st1:place w:st="on">Middle
East</st1:place> and elsewhere as well as the shredding of civil rights here
at home. I’d say 9/11 is THE event that people need to reinvestigate
because everything that has followed is a DIRECT result of that day and those
events.<o:p></o:p></span></font></b></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><font size=2 color=black face="Comic Sans MS"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Comic Sans MS";color:black;font-weight:
bold'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></b></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><font size=2 color=black face="Comic Sans MS"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Comic Sans MS";color:black;font-weight:
bold'>Kris<o:p></o:p></span></font></b></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><font size=2 color=black face="Comic Sans MS"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Comic Sans MS";color:black;font-weight:
bold'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></b></p>
<div>
<div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><font size=3
face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>
<hr size=2 width="100%" align=center tabIndex=-1>
</span></font></div>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><font size=2 face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold'>From:</span></font></b><font size=2
face=Tahoma><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Tahoma'> <st1:PersonName
w:st="on">HoustonPF@yahoogroups.com</st1:PersonName> [mailto:<st1:PersonName
w:st="on">HoustonPF@yahoogroups.com</st1:PersonName>] <b><span
style='font-weight:bold'>On Behalf Of </span></b>Eric Ribellarsi<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Sent:</span></b> Thursday, December 02, 2010
1:21 AM<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>To:</span></b> 'PAA';
notinourname@yahoogroups.com; guerrillatheatrebrigade@yahoogroups.com;
graham2639@mindspring.com<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Cc:</span></b> 'Bart Boyce'; 'Ken Freeland';
'Julianne Gustafson-Lira'; 'HoustonPF'<br>
<b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Subject:</span></b> [HoustonPF] Re: Ho Hum:
More Wikileaks "Chickenfeed"</span></font><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'> <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<!--~-|**|PrettyHtmlStartT|**|-~--><!--~-|**|PrettyHtmlEndT|**|-~-->
<div id=ygrp-mlmsg>
<div style='z-index:1' id=ygrp-msg>
<div id=ygrp-text>
<table class=MsoNormalTable border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0>
<tr>
<td valign=top style='padding:0in 0in 0in 0in'>
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'>Hey everyone:<br>
<br>
I have to strongly disagree. The majority of the cables aren't even publicly
available. Of course the cable the Us media will choose to report on will be
the uninteresting ones. That is there role. But many documents about <st1:country-region
w:st="on">Israel</st1:country-region> are coming, as are 4000 documents
related to <st1:country-region w:st="on">US</st1:country-region> intervention
in <st1:country-region w:st="on">Nepal</st1:country-region> that may show the
<st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">US</st1:country-region></st1:place>'s
plans for a coup attempt there.<br>
<br>
This is a huge fucking deal. The <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region
w:st="on">US</st1:country-region></st1:place> empire is literally shocked
and is being forced to send damage control emails (<a
href="http://southasiarev.wordpress.com/2010/11/30/u-s-ambassador-to-nepal-first-damage-control-over-coming-leaks/">http://southasiarev.wordpress.com/2010/11/30/u-s-ambassador-to-nepal-first-damage-control-over-coming-leaks/</a>)
to it's puppets all over the planet. This is a blow to its very ability to
orchestrate and run things. For once: people are spying on it, instead of the
other way around!<br>
<br>
The people who run wikileaks now have their lives in danger, and they need
our support and solidarity. And the people of the world need us to help
promote the more profound things that come out of these leaks.<br>
<br>
If we are so set in a particular view of exactly what a blow to <st1:place
w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">US</st1:country-region></st1:place>
imperialism's credibility with look like (ie. 9/11 truth), then we will miss
it when a real blow actually does come. A working group of us here in <st1:City
w:st="on">Houston</st1:City> are going to be looking particularly at the <st1:place
w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">Nepal</st1:country-region></st1:place>
leaks when they become available, and trying to process them and expose what
is in them. I think that's the kind of response we should be having to this.<br>
<br>
your comrade and friend, until we win (and even then),<br>
<br>
eric r<br>
<br>
--- On <b><span style='font-weight:bold'>Wed, 12/1/10, <st1:PersonName w:st="on">Ron
and Kris Graham</st1:PersonName> <i><span style='font-style:italic'><graham2639@mindspring.com></span></i></span></b>
wrote:<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><font size=3
face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'><br>
From: <st1:PersonName w:st="on">Ron and Kris Graham</st1:PersonName>
<graham2639@mindspring.com><br>
Subject: Ho Hum: More Wikileaks "Chickenfeed"<br>
To: "'PAA'" <discuss@paa-tx.org>, notinourname@yahoogroups.com,
guerrillatheatrebrigade@yahoogroups.com<br>
Cc: "'Bart Boyce'" <bartboyce@sbcglobal.net>, "'Ken
Freeland'" <diogenesquest@gmail.com>, "'Julianne
Gustafson-Lira'" <liramex123@yahoo.com>, "'HoustonPF'"
<<st1:PersonName w:st="on">HoustonPF@yahoogroups.com</st1:PersonName>>,
"Eric Ribellarsi" <red_star_1949@yahoo.com><br>
Date: Wednesday, December 1, 2010, 6:43 PM<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<div id=yiv56050417>
<div>
<p class=yiv56050417msonormal><b><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt;font-weight:bold'>Has no one noticed that <st1:place
w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">Israel</st1:country-region></st1:place>
comes out smelling like a rose from these Wikileaks? Has no one noticed that <st1:country-region
w:st="on">Israel</st1:country-region> appears vindicated in its call for
bombing <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">Iran</st1:country-region></st1:place>
into the Stone Age? Has no one noticed these Wikileaks cables don’t
tell anybody much of anything that he or she did not already know or suspect
unless he or she was living in a cave? Who is Wikileaks? Who is Julian
Assange and what is his angle? No one seems to know where he is. Assange is
probably hanging out in CIA headquarters in <st1:City w:st="on">Langley</st1:City>
, <st1:State w:st="on">VA</st1:State> or holed up in <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region
w:st="on">Israel</st1:country-region></st1:place> somewhere blowing Binyamin
Netanyahu. Has no one noticed that a lot of these cables give justification
for bombing <st1:country-region w:st="on">Iran</st1:country-region> because <st1:country-region
w:st="on">Saudi Arabia</st1:country-region> and some other unnamed Arab
states supposedly feel threatened by <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region
w:st="on">Iran</st1:country-region></st1:place> ? Bullshit!!! <font
color=red><span style='color:red'>A poll was taken in the Middle East and 80%
of Arab people feel <st1:country-region w:st="on">ISRAEL</st1:country-region>
is the #1 threat to the region followed by 77% thinking the <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region
w:st="on">U.S.</st1:country-region></st1:place> is the second biggest
threat. Only 10% of Arabs felt like <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region
w:st="on">Iran</st1:country-region></st1:place> was the major threat. That
information was reported by Noam Chomsky on Democracy NOW by the way. </span></font>The
dictators in the various Arab countries want the <st1:country-region w:st="on">United
States</st1:country-region> or <st1:country-region w:st="on">Israel</st1:country-region>
to bomb <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">Iran</st1:country-region></st1:place>
. Even if <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">Iran</st1:country-region></st1:place>
did have a nuclear weapon, who the fuck cares?! The <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region
w:st="on">United States</st1:country-region></st1:place> is sitting on a
stockpile of nuclear weapons!! So are <st1:country-region w:st="on">Israel</st1:country-region>
, <st1:country-region w:st="on">Great Britain</st1:country-region> , <st1:country-region
w:st="on">India</st1:country-region> , <st1:country-region w:st="on">China</st1:country-region>
, <st1:country-region w:st="on">France</st1:country-region> , <st1:country-region
w:st="on">Pakistan</st1:country-region> , and <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region
w:st="on">North Korea</st1:country-region></st1:place> !!! What hypocrisy!!
Is it any surprise that members of the State Department and others call the
leaders in other countries names and speak disparagingly about them? This is
not news.</span></font></b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=yiv56050417msonormal><b><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt;font-weight:bold'> </span></font></b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=yiv56050417msonormal><b><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt;font-weight:bold'>These cables show the <st1:place
w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">United States</st1:country-region></st1:place>
government for what it is and that is a chicken shit failed imperial
superpower with a god complex. That’s not fucking news, people!! Has
anybody been paying attention or has everybody’s head been up their
collective asses?! Maybe the American people are so fucking uninformed and
brainwashed that they think these cables are news! I suppose when one listens
to the MSM all day and reads the rag newspapers and spends all his or her
time working, shopping, drinking beer or fucking then these Wikileaks cables
are news. Of course, the fucking MSM is bought and paid for! They know who
they serve and it sure as hell isn’t the American public. Of course,
the information from the cables was cherry picked by the <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region
w:st="on">U.S.</st1:country-region></st1:place> media! Is that surprising?
Of course not, if you’ve been paying attention.</span></font></b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=yiv56050417msonormal><b><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt;font-weight:bold'> </span></font></b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=yiv56050417msonormal><b><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt;font-weight:bold'>I’m with Gordon Duff. I think
Wikileaks is a CIA/Mossad tool. Why do we not read any cables about 9/11
which was the catalyst for all the unconstitutional and illegal shit that has
followed?! Has anybody other than Robert Graham inquired about that?! I
noticed that nobody even answered Robert’s e-mail about that little
fact. The <st1:country-region w:st="on">U.S.</st1:country-region> government
needed its new “Pearl Harbor” so they could start endless wars
and build WMD ‘til the cows come home and they damned well got their
new <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:City w:st="on">Pearl</st1:City></st1:place>
Harbor. Why the majority of people in the <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region
w:st="on">United States</st1:country-region></st1:place> seem to care little
for that and seem willing to put 9/11 to bed and just accept the bogus 9/11
Commission report (cover up) is beyond me. The old canard, “My country
right or wrong” must be to blame. People just don’t want to
think. They must want to be told what to do, when to do it, how to do it and
where to do it. The majority of the American people are zombies.</span></font></b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=yiv56050417msonormal><b><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt;font-weight:bold'> </span></font></b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=yiv56050417msonormal><b><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt;font-weight:bold'>Kris</span></font></b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=yiv56050417msonormal><b><font size=4 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:14.0pt;font-weight:bold'> </span></font></b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=yiv56050417msonormal><b><font size=4 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:14.0pt;font-weight:bold'>Ho Hum: More Wikileaks
"Chickenfeed"</span></font></b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=yiv56050417msonormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'> <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=yiv56050417msonormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'>By Gordon Duff<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=yiv56050417msonormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'> <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=yiv56050417msonormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'><a href="http://www.globalresearch.ca"
target="_blank">Global Research</a>, December 1, 2010<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=yiv56050417msonormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'><a href="http://veteranstoday.com" target="_blank">Veterans
Today</a> <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=yiv56050417msonormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'> <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=yiv56050417msonormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'>The new Wikileaks claims the <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region
w:st="on">US</st1:country-region></st1:place> undereported by 15,000, the
deaths of Iraqi “civilians.” With the numbers listed by the
military as little as 10% or less of the actual deaths, bumping up the
numbers must be a joke. More leaks about torture and killings, Iraqi
torture and the <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">US</st1:country-region></st1:place>
“looking away?” More idiocy. With the <st1:place
w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">US</st1:country-region></st1:place>
sending “suspects” around the world on rendition flights, sent to
secret prisons and obvious to anyone with a brain, to shallow graves, this
Wikileak is simply another sideshow, more “chickenfeed.”<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>Things
have already come apart in <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">Iraq</st1:country-region></st1:place>
. Why leak this now? Regular news stories are actually going much
further than these “leaks.” It doesn’t take a rocket
scientist to see the agenda here, an agenda with absolutely nothing to do
with enlightening the world.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>What
does it prove, any of it? For sure, we see one thing. Everything
leaked is carefully screened to have nothing of real value. With Mossad
running around <st1:City w:st="on">Mosul</st1:City> , operating out of <st1:place
w:st="on">Erbil</st1:place> , supplying and advising the terrorist PKK, not a
word is mentioned. Instead, poor Iranians are swimming the <st1:place
w:st="on">Euphrates</st1:place> with explosives strapped to their chests.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>Get
real.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>Thousands
of tons of explosives were “mislaid” in <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region
w:st="on">Iraq</st1:country-region></st1:place> . The <st1:place
w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">US</st1:country-region></st1:place>
failed to secure Saddam’s weapons depots which were looted. These
stockpiles were vast. The idea that anyone would need to bring weapons
into <st1:country-region w:st="on">Iraq</st1:country-region> is insane,
simply another Israeli ploy to pre-stage an attack on <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region
w:st="on">Iran</st1:country-region></st1:place> . Any fool can see
this in seconds.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<h4><b><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>In
fact, there are more assault rifles in <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region
w:st="on">Iraq</st1:country-region></st1:place> than people.<o:p></o:p></span></font></b></h4>
<p><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>While
trying to blame <st1:country-region w:st="on">Iran</st1:country-region> , is
Wikileaks reporting the hundreds of thousands of weapons bought by the <st1:country-region
w:st="on">US</st1:country-region> that simply disappeared in <st1:place
w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">Iraq</st1:country-region></st1:place>
? It is easier to buy an assault rifle or RPG in <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region
w:st="on">Iraq</st1:country-region></st1:place> than to get potato chips.
This need to blame <st1:country-region w:st="on">Iran</st1:country-region> ,
the idea that “secret agents” are smuggling ordnance into <st1:place
w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">Iraq</st1:country-region></st1:place>
, a country loaded with explosives, is insane. Who would believe
it? The idiotic controlled press?<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>What
will we see if we watch the stories coming out? Where will the press be
told to manipulate the public to look?<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><strong><b><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'>THE LIES BEGIN…</span></font></b></strong><o:p></o:p></p>
<h3><b><font size=4 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:13.5pt'><a
href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-10-23/pentagon-documents-show-u-s-ignored-torture-abuse-reports-guardian-says.html"
target="_blank">“Iran’s Training for Iraqi Militants Outlined in
Leaked Pentagon Documents”</a><o:p></o:p></span></font></b></h3>
<p><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>Bloomberg
and The Guardian start the ball rolling. Imagine <st1:country-region
w:st="on">Iraq</st1:country-region> , a country with the 3rd largest military
force in the world, needing “trainers” from <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region
w:st="on">Iran</st1:country-region></st1:place> . <st1:country-region
w:st="on">Iran</st1:country-region> with its elite Republican Guard and one
million man army has more people with military training that <st1:place
w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">Britain</st1:country-region></st1:place>
, a fact The Guardian seems oblivious to. One minute, <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region
w:st="on">Iraq</st1:country-region></st1:place> is building nuclear weapons
and threatening the region with SCUD missiles, the next it is having to turn
to “Iranian experts” to build pipe bombs. Has any nation
ever suffered such a case of collective amnesia in the area of weapons
technology before?<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><strong><b><i><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt;font-style:italic'>As the days pass, we can expect more and more
fanciful accounts of Iranian spies, trainers, kidnappers and terrorists, each
story more sensational and fictitious than the last.</span></font></i></b></strong><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>There
is a more insidious aspect to Wikileaks. Through representing itself as
“anti-war” and “public spirited,” it carries forward
a globalist agenda, promoting war, promoting regional strife, coincidentally
all directly tied to <st1:country-region w:st="on">Israel</st1:country-region>
’s “hit list,” the nations <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region
w:st="on">Israel</st1:country-region></st1:place> openly advocates someone
else destroys.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><em><b><i><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt;
font-weight:bold'>One could easily describe Wikileaks as a Mossad PsyOp.</span></font></i></b></em><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>Thus,
Wikileaks is very effective in derailing genuine dialog and meaningful
dissent.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><strong><b><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'>ATTORNEY GENERAL GONZALES TOLD US TORTURE WAS GOOD FOR US</span></font></b></strong><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>Americans
proved long ago that they were immune to guilt about torture and
killing. In fact, polls show that the more religious an American, the
more willing they are to accept brutality, and few countries are as
“religious’ as <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">America</st1:country-region></st1:place>
. No other country in recent times has killed as many people as <st1:country-region
w:st="on">America</st1:country-region> , even overshadowing the ethnic
cleansing in <st1:country-region w:st="on">Rwanda</st1:country-region> and <st1:country-region
w:st="on">Bosnia</st1:country-region> or the “situation” in <st1:place
w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">Israel</st1:country-region></st1:place>
.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>As with
the earlier “leak,” Wikileaks has the ability to go through
hundreds of thousands of pages of documents, carefully eliminating any
blackmarket dealings, drug running or, as with <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region
w:st="on">Iraq</st1:country-region></st1:place> , the massive corruption and
theft of oil.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<h4><b><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>There
are dozens of subjects that seem to be carefully screened from any
Wikileak. Even the Department of Defense, not so secretly, thanks
Wikileaks for holding back really embarrassing information. “Held
back” information is, of course, blackmail.<o:p></o:p></span></font></b></h4>
<p><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>Who is
Wikileaks?<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<h3><b><font size=4 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:13.5pt'>Is
Wikileaks <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">Israel</st1:country-region></st1:place>
?<o:p></o:p></span></font></b></h3>
<p><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>Only <st1:place
w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">Israel</st1:country-region></st1:place>
has the penetration of the Department of Defense that would allow this kind
of spying. Not only can they do it, they also have so many spies in the
American chain of command, they could easily prevent it. Who has the
facilities to gather and filter this much data? Who would want to?<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>With
the biggest story in <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">Iraq</st1:country-region></st1:place>
the falsified intelligence on “weapons of mass destruction,” why
didn’t Wikileaks get us documents on this? We know that the
military had orders to try to falsify documents showing that they found fully
operating nuclear, biological and chemical warfare facilities. These
would have made good reading along with the thousands of pages of reports
about how these stories would be fabricated. Even the “controlled
press” wouldn’t touch them although they are still out there.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>The
lies.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>Exposing
this real <st1:country-region w:st="on">Iraq</st1:country-region> scandal
would do some good, except for one thing, friends of <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region
w:st="on">Israel</st1:country-region></st1:place> inside the Pentagon were
the creators of this program. Is this why Wikileaks dodges the real
issues? Is it because the trail for much of what happened in <st1:place
w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">Iraq</st1:country-region></st1:place>
heads directly to Tel Aviv?<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>Who
even cares about <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">Iraq</st1:country-region></st1:place>
this many years later?<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>Look at
the watered down reports about American support of Al Qaeda. The <st1:place
w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">US</st1:country-region></st1:place>
is blamed for accidentally helping Al Qaeda by organizing the Sons of
Iraq. In truth, the <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">US</st1:country-region></st1:place>
actually reorganized the Baathists, something far worse than the imaginary
construct “Al Qaeda.” Not a word is said about this.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>One of
the biggest scams of the <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">Iraq</st1:country-region></st1:place>
“experience” was the looting of oil resources. Most easily
verified is the theft of oil from the <st1:City w:st="on">Kirkuk</st1:City>
fields through the Kirkuk/Ceyhan pipeline, which goes to the Mediterranean
through <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">Turkey</st1:country-region></st1:place>
. Ships that load oil are shown on locator sights run by insurance
companies and even the US Coast Guard. Their tonnage is available, how
many ships, how long. When doing the math, how much oil is loaded
compared to how much is paid for, billions and billions of dollars of oil is
missing.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>When
Americans were paying $4 a gallon for gas, how many knew the oil that made
the gasoline was “free” to the oil companies? Who spit the
take on this? Who was paid? How much was stolen through <st1:place
w:st="on"><st1:City w:st="on">Basra</st1:City></st1:place> ? Were the
British involved?<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>Then we
have Fallujah. We are told <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region
w:st="on">America</st1:country-region></st1:place> “carpet
bombed” civilians and “ethnically cleansed” the area, as we
are now informed, for no reason. The version the Army told is being
debunked along with the phony stories of the “embedded”
press. Nothing on this hit Wikileaks either.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>We are
also noting <a
href="http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/10/15/38-hiroshimas-hidden-how%e2%80%99d-the-army-do-that/"
target="_blank">high levels of radiation</a> there and a health crisis that
can only be described as shocking. Where is Wikileaks on this REAL
story?<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>There
is little doubt that Wikileaks is a “sideshow’ run by an
intelligence agency with dozens of agents inside the Department of
Defense. Only <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">Israel</st1:country-region></st1:place>
has this capability, having penetrated Defense to such a degree they run it
as their own. What is the agenda of Wikileaks? Is it revealing
the truth? If so, why is the truth censored and watered down to such a
degree as to be “non-news” as the earlier leak had been. In
fact, most stories about leaks are simply speculation and most
“leaks” are little than “chickenfeed.”<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>The
last leak was an attack on <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">Pakistan</st1:country-region></st1:place>
. Wikileaks tried to make a case for <st1:country-region w:st="on">Pakistan</st1:country-region>
running the Taliban in <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">Afghanistan</st1:country-region></st1:place>
. However, the Taliban are Pashtun and don’t care much for <st1:place
w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">Pakistan</st1:country-region></st1:place>
, they are “blood enemies.” Because of this, <st1:country-region
w:st="on">Israel</st1:country-region> and <st1:country-region w:st="on">India</st1:country-region>
have found them useful allies against <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region
w:st="on">Pakistan</st1:country-region></st1:place> , the only Islamic
nuclear power. Aid of all kinds gets to the Taliban from the Mossad and
RAW, something Wikileaks worked hard to keep secret.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<h4><b><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>Real
leaks by former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds proved that documents exist
showing that rendition flights were used to ferry terrorists around, move
drugs and tons of cash. With bales of cash leaving <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region
w:st="on">Afghanistan</st1:country-region></st1:place> every day, why is it
that not one page, not one word of any of this, things we know are in
American files, hit Wikileaks?<o:p></o:p></span></font></b></h4>
<p><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>Why
does Wikileaks spend more time hiding things than revealing them? When
the story dies down, are the Julian Assange rape allegations going to be
dragged out again to give the story more play? Last time they
“double dipped” on that one, first charges, then no charges, then
charges. It was like a badly written “soap opera.” We
have just received reports of Julian Assange fleeing Pentagon death
squads. We are told he has virtually disappeared off the face of the
planet. We also have a schedule of public appearances and interviews
for Assange, who will mysteriously re-materialize when needed. Ah, to
have powers such as those.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>What
about this new “leak?”<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>This
one may be aimed at <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">Iran</st1:country-region></st1:place>
.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>Anyone
surprised or shocked to find that Iraqi security forces killed or tortured
people is living on their own private planet. These were Saddam’s
killers and torturers first. Then they became ours. What do
killers and torturers do?<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>There
was one reason for the invasion of <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region
w:st="on">Iraq</st1:country-region></st1:place> with all the lies, all the
killing, all the corruption. <st1:country-region w:st="on">Israel</st1:country-region>
wanted <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">Iraq</st1:country-region></st1:place>
destroyed. Will Wikileaks ever get to something real?<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><font size=3
face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>
<hr size=2 width="100%" align=center>
</span></font></div>
<p class=yiv56050417msonormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'>© Copyright Gordon Duff, <a
href="http://veteranstoday.com" target="_blank">Veterans Today</a>, 2010 <br>
<br>
The url address of this article is: <a
href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=22202"
target="_blank">www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=22202</a> <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><font size=3
face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'>
<hr size=2 width="100%" align=center>
</span></font></div>
<p class=yiv56050417msonormal><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt'><br>
© Copyright 2005-2007 GlobalResearch.ca<br>
Web site engine by <a href="http://www.polygraphx.com" target="_blank">Polygraphx
Multimedia</a> © Copyright 2005-2007<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=yiv56050417msonormal><b><font size=2 color=black face="Comic Sans MS"><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Comic Sans MS";color:black;font-weight:
bold'> </span></font></b><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><font size=3 face="Times New Roman"><span style='font-size:12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
<div><!--~-|**|PrettyHtmlStart|**|-~-->
<p class=MsoNormal><font size=3 color=white face="Times New Roman"><span
style='font-size:12.0pt;color:white'>__._,_.___<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>