<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;"><BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid">
<DIV id=yiv1758208670>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 border=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=top>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid"><BR>
<DIV id=yiv1758208670yiv163322540>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 border=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=top>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid"><BR>
<DIV id=yiv1758208670yiv163322540yiv1851491689>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 border=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=top>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid">
<DIV id=yiv1758208670yiv163322540yiv1851491689yiv1115828312yiv1269392027>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 border=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=top>
<DIV><BR><FONT size=3> </FONT><FONT size=2>Greetings all,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2> Could the negotiations between Clinton-Obama vs.Netanyahu have gone something like this:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Clinton-Obama: "Bibi, would you please stop the construction of the settlements</FONT><FONT size=2> (ILLEGAL) for just 3 more months to restart the peace negotiations with Palestine. You see we would love to </FONT>go down in history as the first administration to bring peace to the <SPAN class=yiv1758208670yiv163322540yiv1851491689yshortcuts id=yiv1758208670yiv163322540yiv1851491689lw_1291835504_0>Middle East</SPAN>.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2> </FONT><FONT size=2><SPAN class=yiv1758208670yiv163322540yiv1851491689yshortcuts id=yiv1758208670yiv163322540yiv1851491689lw_1291835504_1 style="CURSOR: hand; BORDER-BOTTOM: #366388 2px dotted">Netanyahu</SPAN>: "We tried that for almost a year and it didn't work. That stubborn and unreasonable Abbas wants </FONT><FONT size=2>all settlements (illegal) to stop permanently.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Clinton-0bama: "What if we gave you 20 F-35 fighter jets worth 3 billion dollars, </FONT>would you stop building for 3 more months?"</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Netanyhu: "Hey that sounds very tempting, but I will have to take it back to <SPAN class=yiv1758208670yiv163322540yiv1851491689yshortcuts id=yiv1758208670yiv163322540yiv1851491689lw_1291835504_2>Israel</SPAN> and get an OK. I'll get back to you."</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Clinton-Obama: "You can see we are on our knees. Please make us look good." </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3>Thanks for indulging me. It could have happened just like that.</FONT><FONT size=3> </FONT></DIV>
<DIV>Bob</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3> The following article by McClatchy Newspapers was in today's Chronicle (Dec. 8) in a truncated form. Paragraphs 7,8,9,10 and 13 were left out in the Chronicle version. </FONT> I didn't know they could pick and choose like that.</DIV>
<DIV> The title of the article below is U.S. DROPS PUSH FOR ISRAELI FREEZE ON SETTLEMENTS. </DIV>
<DIV> The article below is not perfectly clear to me. Has the U. S. dropped its push for the 3 month Israeli freeze on settlements because Abbas said that Palestine will not negotiate unless all illegal Israeli settlements stop, or did the U.S. drop the 3 month moratoriam request because Israel rejected the 20 jets-3 billion dollar gift? It appears that the latter is correct. Maybe we should have offered 40 jets and a partridge in a pear tree. </DIV>
<DIV> Since the U. S. no longer demands a 3 month freeze on Israeli settlements, does this mean that the U. S. will honor Palestine's demand and require Israel to permanently freeze all settlement building or does it mean that the U. S. will forget the entire matter and allow Israel to continue building the illegal settlements which they have done since 1967. </DIV>
<DIV> One thing is clear. The U. S. is highly baised in favor of Israel, so how can we be an honest broker?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Any comments? </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2> </FONT><BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid">
<DIV id=yiv1758208670yiv163322540yiv1851491689yiv1115828312yiv1269392027yiv2029313315>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 border=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=top>
<DIV id=yiv1758208670yiv163322540yiv1851491689yiv1115828312yiv1269392027yiv2029313315yiv2143336683toolbox>
<DIV id=yiv1758208670yiv163322540yiv1851491689yiv1115828312yiv1269392027yiv2029313315yiv2143336683toolbar>
<DIV class=yiv1758208670yiv163322540yiv1851491689yiv1115828312yiv1269392027yiv2029313315yiv2143336683currentUser id=yiv1758208670yiv163322540yiv1851491689yiv1115828312yiv1269392027yiv2029313315yiv2143336683AvatarOutput_dynamicContent style="MARGIN-TOP: 3px; DISPLAY: none; FLOAT: left; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px"></DIV>
<HR style="CLEAR: both; MARGIN-TOP: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 0px" width="50%" noShade>
By Sheera Frenkel | McClatchy News</DIV>
<DIV> (1)</DIV></DIV>
<DIV id=yiv1758208670yiv163322540yiv1851491689yiv1115828312yiv1269392027yiv2029313315yiv2143336683story_body>
<DIV>JERUSALEM — The U.S. has given up on trying to persuade Israel to declare a moratorium on new building in the <SPAN class=yiv1758208670yiv163322540yiv1851491689yshortcuts id=yiv1758208670yiv163322540yiv1851491689lw_1291835504_3 style="CURSOR: hand; BORDER-BOTTOM: #366388 2px dotted">West Bank</SPAN> in an effort to win Palestinian participation in face-to-face peace talks, the Obama administration said Tuesday. </DIV>
<DIV> (2)</DIV>
<DIV>"After consultation with the parties, we have determined that a moratorium extension will not at this time provide the best basis for resuming direct negotiations," according to a statement provided by the White House. A spokesman specified that the statement should be attributed to "U.S. officials."</DIV>
<DIV> (3)</DIV>
<DIV>The Palestinian Authority has insisted that it will not engage in direct talks with Israel unless Israel freezes all construction for Jewish settlers in the West Bank, something the <SPAN class=yiv1758208670yiv163322540yiv1851491689yshortcuts id=yiv1758208670yiv163322540yiv1851491689lw_1291835504_4 style="CURSOR: hand; BORDER-BOTTOM: #366388 2px dotted">Israelis</SPAN> have refused to do, even after the Obama administration offered to provide Israel with 20 F-35 fighter jets worth $3 billion in return for a 90-day freeze.</DIV>
<DIV> (4)</DIV>
<DIV>The official U.S. statement, however, rejected the idea that the peace talks are dead.</DIV>
<DIV> (5)</DIV>
<DIV>"In the coming days and weeks, we will engage with both sides on the core substantive issues at stake in this conflict, and with the Arab states and other international partners on creating a firm basis to work toward our shared goal of a framework agreement on all permanent status issues — a goal to which we and the parties remain committed," the statement said. "We will continue these efforts next week when the Israeli and Palestinian negotiators visit Washington next week."</DIV>
<DIV> (6)</DIV>
<DIV>There was no immediate reaction from either the Israelis or the Palestinians. Israeli officials have said that previous freezes did little to push forward talks, and accused the Palestinians of setting preconditions to the peace talks.</DIV>
<DIV> (7)</DIV>
<DIV>Earlier in the day, <SPAN class=yiv1758208670yiv163322540yiv1851491689yshortcuts id=yiv1758208670yiv163322540yiv1851491689lw_1291835504_5>Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak</SPAN> told a parliamentary committee that a deal was never reached on a building freeze because the U.S. was preoccupied with the diplomatic crisis over the WikiLeaks cables.</DIV>
<DIV> (8)</DIV>
<DIV>"At the moment, (the talks) have been completely halted," Barak told the Knesset's Committee on Foreign Affairs and Defense.</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=yiv1758208670yiv163322540yiv1851491689yshortcuts id=yiv1758208670yiv163322540yiv1851491689lw_1291835504_6 style="BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%; CURSOR: hand; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none">White House spokesman</SPAN> Tommy Vietor denied the WikiLeaks connection.</DIV>
<DIV> (9)</DIV>
<DIV>"That's completely inaccurate," he said in an e-mail. "There's no connection between WikiLeaks and these negotiations."</DIV>
<DIV> (10)</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=yiv1758208670yiv163322540yiv1851491689yshortcuts id=yiv1758208670yiv163322540yiv1851491689lw_1291835504_7 style="CURSOR: hand; BORDER-BOTTOM: #366388 2px dotted">Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas</SPAN> suggested in a television interview last week that he would dissolve the Palestinian government, a limited form of self-rule agreed in an interim deal in 1993, if a deal for statehood couldn't be achieved.</DIV>
<DIV> (11)</DIV>
<DIV>In March 2010, U.S. officials announced that they would begin mediating indirect "proximity" talks, which involved diplomats shuttling between Israeli and Palestinian leadership.</DIV>
<DIV> (12)</DIV>
<DIV>Those talks were expected to move toward direct negotiations, and the White House hosted a ceremony in September to announce the talks.</DIV>
<DIV> (13)</DIV>
<DIV>But the Israeli renewal of construction in the settlements just a few weeks later meant that the direct talks never got off the ground. The American negotiating team, led by U.S. Mideast envoy <SPAN class=yiv1758208670yiv163322540yiv1851491689yshortcuts id=yiv1758208670yiv163322540yiv1851491689lw_1291835504_8 style="BACKGROUND: none transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%; CURSOR: hand; BORDER-BOTTOM: #366388 2px dotted">George Mitchell</SPAN>, has struggled to bring the two sides to the same negotiating table ever since.</DIV></DIV><BR><BR></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></td></tr></table>